COU202 COUNSELLING PRACTICE

COU202 COUNSELLING PRACTICE

Assessment 3: Role Play of a Counselling Session and Written Reflection (45%)

Due Date: Refer to the specific dates below for each assessment component

This assessment builds on your theoretical knowledge and aims to put that theoretical learning into application.

Working together in groups of 2, students must present a recorded skills demonstration of a counselling session. It is then submitted with a written reflective essay reporting on the students’ reflections on the session.

Students undertaking group assessments will be assessed on their capacities to work effectively in a group setting according to the nature of the group task in each unit. The main criteria include:

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Legislation & Legal Responsibilities – Best Writing Service

Video recording of the role play: (20%)

  • Format will be addressed in tutorials.
  • Length of recording: 15-20 minutes
  • To be uploaded to the student’s OneDrive account (accessible through your student email account), with the video link provided in your written reflective essay
  • Due in Week 10

Written reflective essay: (30%)

Students are required to submit a written analysis of their role play, with the following:

  • Accurate analysis of the counselling interventions and responses made (with specific reference to Egan’s counselling terminology)
  • Suggestions for improved or alternate responses
  • Comments on your demonstration of micro-skills in counselling
  • Suggestions for achievable goals, strategies to achieve goals and developing the client’s commitment to making the change
  • Due in Week 11
YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Briefly summarize your case, highlighting the diagnostic symptoms seen in the case.

Your reflective essay should include at least 8 (scholarly) journal articles read and/or textbook references. The format of your essay will be discussed in greater detail during tutorials.

Do NOT utilise sources such as www.tutor2u.com and other such web materials as these in no way constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignments. If you rely on such sources for theoretical support, you will be deemed NOT to have met the requirements of the assessment.

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Data Communications and Networks Assignment

Roleplay Criteria

Criteria for Grade Excellent 81 – 100% Good 66 – 80% Pass 50 – 65% Fail <49%
Rapport/Relationship Building
20 %
Demonstrates a high-level ability to develop/ deepen the client relationship by using all of the active listening skills. Displays empathy. Discusses confidentiality / boundaries Demonstrates a strong ability to establish the relationship. Uses active listening skills. Displays warmth and positive regard. Discusses confidentiality in detail Counsellor demonstrates some ability in establishing the relationship. Used some of the active listening skills. Displays warmth and positive regard. Discusses confidentiality Counsellor does not sufficiently develop and deepen the relationship. Few active listening skills demonstrated. High level of distraction.
Exploration Stage

20%

Demonstrates a high-level ability in the use of a range of counselling skills, including open- questions, reflection on feeling and meaning, paraphrasing and summarising Demonstrates a good ability in the use of a range of counselling skills, including open- questions, reflection on feeling and meaning, paraphrasing and summarising Demonstrates some ability in the use of a range of counselling skills, including open- questions, reflection on feeling and meaning, paraphrasing and summarising Counsellor does not sufficiently demonstrate a range of skills and/ or skills are incorrectly applied.
Challenge Stage

20%

Demonstrates the capacity to formulate a clear understanding of the client’s problem. Challenges client statements and develops client’s change commitment Demonstrates good capacity to formulate a clear understanding of the client’s problem. Reasonable attempt to develop client’s change commitment Demonstrates some capacity to formulate a clear understanding of the client’s problem. Reasonable attempt to develop client’s change commitment. Demonstrates limited ability in problem identification and does not develop client’s commitment to change
Action Stage
20%
Demonstrates high-level skills and strategies in developing realistic goals with client Demonstrates strong skills and strategies in developing realistic goals with client Demonstrates some skills and strategies in developing realistic goals with client Poor demonstration of skills for goal setting. Goals set are not realistic for the client.
Structure of Session and Closing
10%
Demonstrates high-level ability to maintain focus and direction of session and closes effectively Demonstrates good ability to maintain focus and direction of session and closes effectively Demonstrates some ability to maintain focus and direction of session and closes effectively Demonstrates low level ability in maintaining focus and direction of session. Closure poor
Length of Session
10%
Session 15 mins Session 12-14 mins Session 10-11 mins Session under 10 mins

Assessment Criteria

Reflective Essay

Criteria for Essay Weight 100% Areas to be covered HD D C P F

Academic writing

20% Statement of purpose of paper: made explicit and followed Demonstrated good understanding of subject (sufficient research conducted) Effective use of outside sources (are there obvious deficiencies or omissions) In-text citations and complete reference list complete and accurate (is there sufficient information to find all print and web sources, and are quotes properly cited)
Accurate analysis using the Egan’s specific terms 20% Well supported with research and analysis Understanding of topic Clear identification of the terms Identify ethical concerns
Comments on your demonstration of counselling skills 15% Demonstrated sound understandings of processes relating to topic Persuasive and sound
Suggestions for improved or alternate responses 15% Persuasive, logical, and compelling research and analysis Recommendations seem plausible, well supported
Suggestions on realistic goal setting and client commitment for change 20% Critical evaluation of topic Effective use of literature to support rationale Recommendations seem plausible, well supported Persuasive and sound Clear future session plan
Overall Presentation 10% Overall structure: introduction, body, conclusion Persuasiveness Effective use of tables, illustrations, and figures
Criteria for report High Distinction 80% > Distinction 70%- 79% Credit 60-69% Pass 50-59% Fail <50%
Academic Writing Demonstrates very clear and good understanding of the subject, highly effective use of outside sources, clear and concise in text citations and referencing. Demonstrates clear and good understanding of the subject, effective use of outside sources, clear and concise in text citations and referencing. Demonstrates well understanding of the subject, effective use of outside sources, clear and concise in text citations and referencing. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the subject, use of outside sources, and in text citations and referencing. Demonstrates poorly the understanding of the subject, effective use of outside sources, unclear and omitting in text citations and referencing.
Accurate analysis using the Egan’s specific terms Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on most recent scholarly literature Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on relevant literature Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on provision of supervision and often cites the relevant literature. Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and are not always accurate and sometimes incomplete, sometimes cites the relevant literature. Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and research are inaccurate or incomplete, does not cite the relevant literature.
Comments on your demonstration of counselling skills Shows a deep understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows an excellent understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows a good understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows a basic understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows poor, insufficient understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population
Suggestions for improved or alternated responses Provides in-depth suggestions for improved or alternated responses Provides excellent suggestions for improved or alternated responses Provides good suggestions for improved or alternated responses Provides several suggestions for improved or alternated responses Provides no suggestions for improved or alternated responses
Suggestions on realistic goal setting and client commitment for change Demonstrates very clear rationale for goal setting and client change. Draws on most recent scholarly literature Demonstrates clear rationale for goal setting and client change. Draws on relevant scholarly literature Demonstrates rationale for goal setting and client change. Often draws on scholarly literature Demonstrates rationale for goal setting and client change is incomplete. Sometimes draws on scholarly literature Demonstrates inaccurate rationales for goal setting and client change. Lack citing of scholarly literature
Presentation of report and correct references used All levels of content are covered in depth. Wide range of contemporary references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made High level of content is covered in depth. Wide range of good references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made Appropriate content is covered in reasonable depth. Sources are generally well cited when specific statements are made Most major sections of the relevant content included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected References were basic and some errors of citation Major sections of relevant content have been omitted or missed Inadequate references and poor citation
TOTAL

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

CLICK THE BUTTON TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Mini project