(Q) In each of the following, I need to assess whether the argument is valid. If it is, I need to give…

In each of the following, I need to assess whether the argument is valid. If it is, I need to give a formal proof with first-order logic. You may not use AnaCon nor TautCon. You must also simplify Modus Tollens and Modus Ponens, if necessary.
1. ¬?x (Cube(x) ? Small(x)) from the premise ¬?x (Cube(x).
2. ?x ¬Cube(x) from the premises ?x((Cube(x) ? Large(x)) ? FrontOf(x,a)) and ?x(Large(x) ? ¬FrontOf(x,a))
3. ?x?y Smaller(x, y) from the premise ?y?x Smaller (x, y)
Translate the sentences from English to first-order logic (Translation 1 file), and from first-order logic to English (Translation 2 file).

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  WK 6.2 HR discussion

s:

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for A 100% ORIGINAL PAPER!Use Discount Code “Original Paper” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

In each of the following, I need to assess whether the argument is valid. If it is, I need to give… .

“”

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  (Q) Reframing organisation | Computer Science homework help

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

CLICK THE BUTTON TO MAKE YOUR ORDER