Types of Statistical Analysis Report

Temple University Week 3 Healthcare Policy and Law Paper

Temple University Week 3 Healthcare Policy and Law Paper
Assignment 1: Health Policy and Law BasicsDue Week 3 and worth 150 pointsAs a chief operating officer of a hospital, you have been tasked with opening a new ambulatory care center in your city.Write a 2-3 page paper in which you:Specify whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debate at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Analyze the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.Points: 150Assignment 1: Health Policy and Law BasicsCriteria UnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% D Fair70-79% C Proficient80-89% B Exemplary90-100% A1. Specify whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debate at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Weight: 45%Did not submit or incompletely specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Did not submit or incompletely debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Insufficiently specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Insufficiently debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Insufficiently provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Partially specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Partially debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Partially provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Satisfactorily specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Satisfactorily debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Satisfactorily provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Thoroughly specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Thoroughly debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Thoroughly provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.2. Analyze the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Weight: 40%Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Insufficiently analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Partially analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Satisfactorily analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Thoroughly analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.3. 2 references Weight: 5%No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirementsWeight: 10%More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors presentInclude a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  (Q) security strategy implementation recommendations for sifers grayson

essay 7 pages and outline and evidences

essay 7 pages and outline and evidences
Written expression is an important quality for any form of civil discourse. Equally important, and intimately related to this requirement, is the ability to demonstrate clarity and organization of thought. Developing, communicating, and defending ideas is a crucial element in the writing process. The ability to anticipate and defend counterarguments is also an important factor in this process. To that end, this final assignment is meant to draw on your experiences throughout this course and culminate in a persuasive essay that demonstrates your ability to find evidence and use logic to make your case for or against the fundamental question of:Can Racial Equity Exist in American Health Care? Please find the grading rubric above. You should have used it to generate an outline for the body of this paper through your Week 14 Assignment. Be sure to use the rubric to structure your Argumentative Essay with each component that is asked of you. As stated in the Week 15 Assignment, proper citation of references is required and is a function of academic integrity as well as a professional expectation. Additional Guidance:The paper should be as direct and concise as possible. This should put your paper in the 6-8 page range. Follow the rubric like a recipe, with each section following the next as listed, in order. The opening statement should briefly explain the aim of the paper and state your position and main arguments briefly.The major problems of the case should start broadly regarding inequity in the health care system and then outline the major issues around racism and its role in health disparities as you’ve been learning in this class. This is your chance to provide an overview and demonstrate your understanding of the key components of this course. Then proceed to convince the reader on your position through evidence-based and logical arguments (minimum of 3).You are not limited in the materials to use to support your paper. Use things from class as well as your skills in being an educated consumer of knowledge to provide a solid foundations for your arguments.For counterarguments (minimum of 2), determine what you think an opponent of your position would say and then use evidence and logic to further defend your position.For the plausible solutions and/or compromises (minimum of 2), think of common ground ideas that could work towards a more just system of healthcare for all. You do not need to provide every detail and steps in planning, just 2-3 ideas and brief explanations as to why they could work. Conclude the paper by restating your position with strong, convincing language, as if it were the most critical issue at hand today (it kind of is).

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  (Q) leadership journal 6

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

CLICK THE BUTTON TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Controlling Project Performance and Project Closure